Bug 1306397

Summary: [openstack] Backport bulk inspection error output
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Joe Talerico <jtaleric>
Component: python-rdomanager-oscpluginAssignee: Brad P. Crochet <brad>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Omri Hochman <ohochman>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)CC: apevec, athomas, brad, dcadzow, dmacpher, dyasny, hbrock, jslagle, lhh, mburns, nlevinki, rhel-osp-director-maint, tsedovic, yeylon
Target Milestone: y3Keywords: FeatureBackport
Target Release: 7.0 (Kilo)   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: python-rdomanager-oscplugin-0.0.10-28.el7ost Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1309824 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-18 16:53:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1309824    

Description Joe Talerico 2016-02-10 17:26:11 UTC
Description of problem:
OSP7 openstack baremetal bulk introspection returns that there was a error, but does not return which nodes had errors. Liberty has a patch to have a bit more output with failures.

Comment 2 Angus Thomas 2016-02-11 11:01:07 UTC
We can't backport this into the 7.3 release, because we're out of time and this is essentially an RFE, rather than a fix for a regression. 

In addition to aaddressing this in the next release, we can look into creating a validation check to assist with this. Those are consumable by field engineers deploying OSP director as soon as they're written and don't need to wait for a product release. 

Tomas, can you please look into addressing this issue with a validation?

Comment 3 Dan Yasny 2016-02-11 17:17:58 UTC
duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302386 maybe?

Comment 4 Mike Burns 2016-02-11 17:27:37 UTC
(In reply to Dan Yasny from comment #3)
> duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302386 maybe?

No, this bug handles the return code for bulk introspection.  The other one just makes a host failure more visible.  They're similar, but not duplicates.

Comment 6 Dan Macpherson 2016-02-16 06:49:04 UTC
Mike, do you know if this bug will make it to 7.3? Angus seemed to indicate that it wouldn't in comment #2.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-02-18 16:53:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.