Bug 1306592

Summary:	perl-DBD-Pg is not available in RHEL-6.7, Client variant
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Andrew Thomas <anthomas>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.8	CC:	anthomas, lberk, lkocman, mbenitez, mcermak, nathans, nobody+bgollahe, ppisar, psabata, salmy
Target Milestone:	rc	Flags:	mprchlik: needinfo? (nobody+bgollahe)
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1353449 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-20 08:42:07 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1353449

Description Miloš Prchlík 2016-02-11 11:57:09 UTC

Description of problem:

Please, provide perl-DBD-Pg package also in Client variant of RHEL6. As of now, it is available only for Server variant of RHEL-6.7, which prevents package pcp-pmda-postgresql from installation on Client, as it requires perl(DBD::Pg).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

perl-DBD-Pg-2.15.1-4.el6_3
pcp-pmda-postgresql-3.10.9-6.el6


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2016-02-11 12:03:34 UTC

Mapping packages to products is performed by release engineers.

Comment 2 Miloš Prchlík 2016-03-08 08:34:11 UTC

I'm just curious, any chance of getting this one to RHEL-6.8?

Comment 4 Lubos Kocman 2016-10-20 08:42:07 UTC

This is by design

core packages for each variant are defined by supported comps groups. This package simply ends up in optional since it didn't get trough basic building blocks.

I'm marking it as NOTABUG unless we get a customer issue that they do really need that supported in client and explicit PM ack ...

We could also just drop all variants ;-)

Lubos