| Summary: | fwupd failed dependency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Roy A. Gilmore <rag> |
| Component: | fwupd | Assignee: | Richard Hughes <rhughes> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | rhughes |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-28 07:36:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Roy A. Gilmore
2016-02-12 17:06:09 UTC
I don't see why dnf wouldn't pick this up automatically. Either way, I've not seen this on f23 or f24, but please re-open this if you still see it. Dnf does pick it up automatically. See this output: [nobody@nowhere foobar]# dnf check-update Last metadata expiration check performed 0:07:10 ago on Fri Apr 1 09:07:39 2016. fwupd.x86_64 0.1.5-3.fc22 updates [nobody@nowhere foobar]# dnf update Last metadata expiration check performed 0:07:18 ago on Fri Apr 1 09:07:39 2016. Dependencies resolved. ==================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ==================================================================================================================================== Skipping packages with broken dependencies: fwupd x86_64 0.1.5-3.fc22 updates 112 k Transaction Summary ==================================================================================================================================== Skip 1 Package Nothing to do. Complete! It may not exist in f23 or f24, but (I'm not trying to be sarcastic here) I filed the bug against f22, and as of this moment it still exists in f22. As far as I know f22 is still supported. I think you need to move to f23 or f24 at this point, sorry. I know that the reason I couldn't upgrade to F23 is not anyone at Fedora's concern, but, the reason I couldn't upgrade to F23 was that F23 broke vmWare. I know some people consider it blasphemy that I use proprietary software, but I haven't found an open source virtualization package that is as stable, and works as well as vmWare. Eventually a workaround was found, and I did upgrade. This bug doesn't effect me any more, but, I'm really not sure why this wasn't fixed. It didn't require any troubleshooting, or writing code, it was just a simple dependency issue that only required adjusting the spec file and repackaging. |