Bug 130744
Summary: | A few typos in the HelixPlayer spec | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ling Li <redhat.bugzilla> |
Component: | HelixPlayer | Assignee: | Colin Walters <walters> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.0.gold-4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-09-14 19:59:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ling Li
2004-08-24 06:39:06 UTC
1,2) Thanks for the fixes, I've merged them into the Fedora spec file. 3) I tried -k and it didn't work. Just wondering why "gold" appears in the version number. I think it is unnecessary and makes things troublesome---for example, you have to bump the epoch for 1.0.1. Why not remove it from the version and mention "gold" somewhere, say, in Summary? I was just trying to track upstream's versioning. I'll remove it for the next upstream version. |