Bug 1308126

Summary: shiboken: FTBFS in rawhide (F24)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: shibokenAssignee: Felix Schwarz <fschwarz>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: fschwarz, jreznik, ltinkl, rdieter, than
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-01 20:59:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1305208, 1320653    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:29:06 UTC
Your package shiboken failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12868998

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:29:10 UTC
Created attachment 1126439 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:29:12 UTC
Created attachment 1126440 [details]
root.log

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:29:14 UTC
Created attachment 1126441 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:13:44 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 5 Felix Schwarz 2016-07-03 19:53:18 UTC
I was able to build shiboken in F24 by upgrading apiextractor to the latest git version (which saw its latest commit years ago). I'm not sure which packages need apiextractor but I guess shiboken is the only consumer so it should be safe to upgrade even in a stable distribution.

Comment 6 Felix Schwarz 2016-08-08 10:39:45 UTC
don't want to step on anyone's toes but I felt that having two "FTBFS in rawhide" bugs (neither of which actually refers to the current F26 rawhide) is rather confusing so I modified the subject a bit.

Comment 7 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-27 10:31:26 UTC
Ok, FTBS fixed in rawhide at least ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=829437 ). I already pushed the change also to the F24 git (more or less accidentlly) but I'm planning to fix the FTBS in F25 at least (and F24 as I already pushed the commit).

Keeping the bug open until F24+F25 are fixed as well.

Comment 8 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-30 23:05:59 UTC
F25+rawhide builds done, F24 builds looks ok so far (though technically still building)

Comment 9 Felix Schwarz 2017-01-01 14:15:45 UTC
well, unfortunately F24 build failed on ARM again (even though it worked on the QA infrastructure + scratch build). F25+rawhide are still fine.

Comment 10 Felix Schwarz 2017-01-01 20:59:11 UTC
shiboken-1.2.4-3.fc24 finally fixes this on all platforms supported by F24.