Bug 1308430
| Summary: | Cleaning up old tasks, sync status wrongly shows repos "Never synced" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Pavel Moravec <pmoravec> |
| Component: | Repositories | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | Nightly | CC: | aperotti, aruzicka, ktordeur, mklika, sauchter |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-02 20:59:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Pavel Moravec
2016-02-15 08:37:32 UTC
Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog. Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog. Would it not make sense to maintain the sync status as part of the metadata of the repository? (In reply to Stuart Auchterlonie from comment #5) > Would it not make sense to maintain the sync status as part of the metadata > of > the repository? I think repository metadata are generated only when publishing the repository, what is a different pulp action than repo sync. It usually (always?) follows repo sync, though. Moreover, repo metadata are AFAIK just written to the disk under /var/lib/pulp and just pulp knows the proper location. It would be weird to get info about latest repo sync (katello request) from something written by pulp to the disk.. Here's me thinking we stored that info in the database somewhere :) This needs to be handled on katello's side. We need to somehow stop relying on tasks always being there and store the needed data ourselves. Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. |