Bug 1308640

Summary:	hammer task progress accepts NIL value for id parameter
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Roman Plevka <rplevka>
Component:	Tasks Plugin	Assignee:	Amit Karsale <akarsale>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Roman Plevka <rplevka>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1.6	CC:	aruzicka, bkearney
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-04 13:19:06 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Roman Plevka 2016-02-15 16:36:39 UTC

Description of problem:
hammer displays a fake progress bar (always 0%) for task with null id

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rubygem-hammer_cli_katello-0.0.7.21-1.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # hammer -v -u admin -p changeme  task progress --id=
or
# hammer -v -u admin -p changeme  task progress --id=''


Actual results:
# hammer -v -u admin -p changeme  task progress --id=
[                       ] [0%]

Expected results:
Error: missing param 'id' in parameters
or
Error: invalid 'id' parameter specified

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-26 19:04:54 UTC

Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog.

Comment 2 Adam Ruzicka 2016-11-16 11:50:50 UTC

Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17358 from this bug

Comment 3 Satellite Program 2017-01-05 16:07:30 UTC

Upstream bug assigned to akarsale

Comment 4 Amit Karsale 2017-01-09 07:02:31 UTC

PR submitted for the mentioned issue, can we have it verified and merged by if appropriate. 

https://github.com/theforeman/hammer-cli-foreman-tasks/pull/31

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2017-08-04 13:19:06 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.