Bug 130919

Summary: bind-devel-10:9.2.4rc7-8 specifies subpackage interdependencies incorrectly
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Component: bindAssignee: Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: kajtzu, oliva
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-08-25 20:08:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nalin Dahyabhai 2004-08-25 19:20:41 UTC
bind-devel-10:9.2.4rc7-8 requires "bind =
%{epoch}:%{name}-%{version}-%{release}".  RPM version strings don't
include the package name, so this requirement won't be satisfied.

The requirement needs to be stated as either "bind =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}", "bind = %{version}-%{release}", or
"bind = %{version}", though in this case I'd recommend "bind =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}".

Comment 1 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-08-25 19:26:36 UTC
*** Bug 130920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-08-25 19:27:40 UTC
Also.. why is the epoch now 10 when rc7 didn't have an epoch at all?

Comment 3 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-25 20:08:57 UTC
This is now fixed in bind-9.2.4rc7-9 .


Comment 4 Jason Vas Dias 2004-08-25 21:59:55 UTC
*** Bug 130940 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 John Flanagan 2004-12-21 19:49:56 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-567.html