Bug 131065
Summary: | GIMLET unable to differentiate LE with the same name | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lawrence Lim <llim> |
Component: | im-sdk | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs, tools-bugs, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-09-21 02:30:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 125997 |
Description
Lawrence Lim
2004-08-27 04:42:41 UTC
If both LEs really have the same name, there is no way that they can be distinguished so it will only ever be possible to choose of them with the current iiimf protocol (or at least the messaging between frontends and gimlet), so IMHO -le-chinput should obsolete -le-newpy or the name of one of them should be changed. However my latest unreleased devel version of gimlet no longer has this restriction I believe. FWIW the next version of gimlet will not show LEs with the same name for the same language however. Just make an observation before I resolve the bug. Tested with jens unreleased devel version of gimlet with chinput-0.3-6 and newpy-12.0.1-3, after X restarted, newpy was picked up. Clicking on GIMLET to check if both LE are listed by GIMLET, only to realise that chinput was the only one listed. Selected the chinput in the GIMLET changes the LE to chinput and newpy is nowhere to be found anymore. |