Bug 131069
Summary: | Should mark named.conf %config(noreplace) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Component: | bind | Assignee: | Jason Vas Dias <jvdias> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-08-27 20:44:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 123268, 1339502 |
Description
Tim Waugh
2004-08-27 08:41:54 UTC
Bind does not supply named.conf - only if /etc/named.conf does not exist at all, it creates a bare minimal /etc/named.conf sufficient only to allow named to run - this was new in bind-9.2.4-rc7-9. There is no entry for named.conf in the bind rpm %files list. Bind does not touch named.conf if it already exists: $ ls -l /etc/named.conf /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Aug 26 16:59 /etc/named.conf -> /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1323 Aug 25 18:16 /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf $ rpm -Uvh --force bind-9.2.4rc7-9.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:bind warning: /etc/rndc.key created as /etc/rndc.key.rpmnew ########################################### [100%] $ ls -l /etc/named.conf /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Aug 26 16:59 /etc/named.conf -> /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1323 Aug 25 18:16 /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf So I can't understand why your named.conf was changed - it could not have been by installation/upgrade of the bind package. If you had installed the caching-nameserver at the same time, that DOES replace named.conf - the named.conf supplied with caching-nameserver is required for named to operate as a caching nameserver - could it have been that package you installed ? Yes, caching-nameserver is the culprit. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-567.html |