| Summary: | -Wunused-const-variable gives too many false positives | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | wibrown <wibrown> |
| Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | davejohansen, jakub, jwakely, law, mpolacek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-10 15:11:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901, -Wunused-const-variable now has two levels: "One level to only check for unused static const variables in the main compilation file. Which is enabled by -Wunused-variable. And a second level that also checks for unused static const variables in included files. Which must be explicitly enabled." It'll be in the next Fedora GCC build I suspect. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Should be fixed in gcc-6.0.0-0.13.fc24. |
Description of problem: It's a common pattern in large software projects to define a single header file shared by many smaller object files. This leads to gcc displaying hundreds of unused const variable warnings where a const defined in the .h may be used in 2 or 3 source, files, but not all. In any file it is not used, the warning is omitted. For example: I0> cat test_b.c #include "test.h" void do_nothing() { return; } I0> cat test_a.c #include "test.h" int main(int argc, char **argv) { do_nothing(); printf("%s\n", hello_world); } I0> cat test.h #include <stdio.h> void do_nothing(); static char* const hello_world = "Hello World"; I0> cat Makefile all: test_a test_a: test_b gcc -Wall -o test test_b.o test_a.c test_b: gcc -Wall -c -fpic -o test_b.o test_b.c Running this yields: gcc -Wall -c -fpic -o test_b.o test_b.c In file included from test_b.c:2:0: test.h:5:20: warning: ‘hello_world’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable] static char* const hello_world = "Hello World"; ^~~~~~~~~~~ gcc -Wall -o test test_b.o test_a.c Which is incorrect: the const variable *is* used, but just not in this file yet. I *like* the idea of the unused-const-variable check, but too many false positives will lead to it being disabled. I am not sure what the correct solution is here: Perhaps const variables in .h files are ignored? Perhaps there needs to be a way to track these over man runs of gcc through a cache / check file? Until this is fixed, I do not think that it is wise to include unused-const-variable in -Wall, as it will create excessive noise and could diminish the value of the feature.