Bug 1312327

Summary: python-djvulibre: Provide a Python 3 subpackage
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tomas Orsava <torsava>
Component: python-djvulibreAssignee: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 25CC: bstinson, dkrejci, jberan, mhroncok, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-djvulibre-0.8-1.fc28 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-10-12 13:29:58 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1285816, 1333770    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Update to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage
none
Update to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage none

Description Tomas Orsava 2016-02-26 12:48:38 UTC 
Upstream, this software supports Python 3. Please provide a Python 3
package for Fedora.


According to the Python packaging guidelines [0], software must be
packaged for Python 3 if upstream supports it.
The guidelines give detailed information on how to do this, and even
provide an example spec file [1].

The current best practice is to provide subpackages for the two Python
versions (called "Common SRPM" in the guidelines). Alternatively, if
nothing depends on your Python2 package, you can just switch to Python 3
entirely.

It's ok to do this in Rawhide only, however, it would be greatly
appreciated if you could push it to Fedora 24 as well.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance with the
porting, you can ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here.
We'll be happy to help!


[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file
Comment 1 Dominika Krejčí 2016-04-20 14:44:09 UTC 
Hello Brian,

Do you need any help adding Python 3 support to the RPM?

If you need more instructions, a [guide] for porting Python-based RPMs is available.

[guide] http://python-rpm-porting.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html
Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2016-07-26 04:08:02 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 25 development cycle.
Changing version to '25'.
Comment 3 Jan Beran 2017-05-19 12:43:23 UTC 
Created attachment 1280415 [details]
Update to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage

* The update is very conservative to avoid older RHEL impact, i.e. there are not used modern macros (%py2_build, %py3_build, %py2_install, %py3_install).
* There are commented nosetests in %check section as they fail by "error: invalid command 'nosetests'".
Comment 4 Jan Beran 2017-06-30 11:38:40 UTC 
Hello Brian,

please could you review the attached updated spec file?

Thank you.

Best regards

Jan
Comment 5 Jan Beran 2017-09-04 06:46:50 UTC 
Created attachment 1321694 [details]
Update to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage

A newer version to reflect the actual spec file. Testing is conditional and temporarily switched-off.
Comment 6 Igor Gnatenko 2017-09-04 07:05:32 UTC 
I think it is time to start non-responsive package maintainer process.
Comment 7 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-09-04 20:42:06 UTC 
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #6)
> I think it is time to start non-responsive package maintainer process.

Indeed. Needinfo with no reply between June and September does not look good.
Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2017-10-12 13:14:32 UTC 
Pushed
Comment 9 Miro Hrončok 2017-10-12 13:29:58 UTC 
Rawhide done. Closing. Reopen if older Fedoras are needed.
Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:18:34 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days