Bug 1312443
Summary: | restrict access to endpoints to localhost only | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Storage Console | Reporter: | Alfredo Deza <adeza> |
Component: | ceph-installer | Assignee: | Andrew Schoen <aschoen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Tejas <tchandra> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 2 | CC: | adeza, ceph-eng-bugs, dahorak, edonnell, gmeno, hnallurv, kdreyer, nlevine, nthomas, sankarshan, sisharma |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 2 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-installer-1.2.2-1.el7scon | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-03-14 15:50:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alfredo Deza
2016-02-26 17:20:28 UTC
This will need a bit more clarification. Even if requests to the installer are narrowed down to only localhost, it means that *any* user in the machine will be able to interact with the installer API. That would defeat a lot of the purpose of restricting the access to localhost only. It would be similar to allowing ceph-deploy to be used by any user on the system: it can be completely destructive to do so. If the path to further restrict this translates to requiring a secret/token/pass of any kind for the API to be able to function then we will need to punt this to a later version. Is this a requirement from product or security? Do we need to consider this? Verified this on build: ceph-installer-1.2.2-1.el7scon Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0515 |