Bug 1314866

Summary: Deleting a private flavor causes access issues with existing instances
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Chris St. Pierre <cstpierr>
Component: openstack-novaAssignee: Eoghan Glynn <eglynn>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: nlevinki <nlevinki>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)CC: berrange, charcrou, dasmith, eglynn, jdonohue, kchamart, mpryc, ndipanov, sbauza, sferdjao, sgordon, vromanso, yeylon
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: 8.0 (Liberty)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1326625 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-13 08:43:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1194008    

Description Chris St. Pierre 2016-03-04 17:45:06 UTC
Description of problem:

Deleting or modifying a private flavor causes various issues when displaying instances booted with that flavor: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1366168

We'd like the pending upstream fix to be backported into OSP8.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1366168/comments/17

Actual results:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1366168/comments/17

Expected results:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1366168/comments/17

Additional info:

Upstream patch is pending at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211809/

Comment 3 Michal Pryc 2016-03-30 18:52:55 UTC
With the rework of the Flavors the Upstream change
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211809/ will not be approved.

Nova engineering team will produce another fix for nova client that will
not fail when displaying instances with deleted private flavors.

Comment 4 Michal Pryc 2016-04-13 08:43:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1326625 ***