Bug 1315962
Summary: | Fsgroup does not work for gitrepo volume | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Chao Yang <chaoyang> |
Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Paul Morie <pmorie> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Chao Yang <chaoyang> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | agoldste, aos-bugs, bchilds, eparis, jsafrane, jvance, mawong, mmcgrath, pmorie, smunilla |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression, Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | atomic-openshift-node-3.4.1.42-1.git.0.e775fe2.el7.x86_64 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
Doc Text: |
undefined
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-08-10 05:15:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Chao Yang
2016-03-09 07:15:07 UTC
The gitrepo volume does not support ownership management. This works as expected. my mistake.. it should work Just a comment related to fsGroup: 123456, and I'm not sure if the ceph-rbd plugin I used to test this supports changing the container's GID, but: When I define fsGroup in the pod spec which uses a ceph-rbd block volume, the resulting container's GID is 0 and the fsGroup is added to the container's supplemental gids. Can't reproduce in kubernetes 1.3 looks like it was fixed by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/22995 I think this bug has been fixed a long time ago, at least I cannot reproduce it in atomic-openshift-node-3.4.1.42-1.git.0.e775fe2.el7.x86_64. Moving to QA to verify it in 3.6. It is passed on oc v3.6.153 kubernetes v1.6.1+5115d708d7 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:1716 |