Bug 1316594
Summary: | [RFE][swift] Put part-replicas where they go | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Sean Cohen <scohen> |
Component: | openstack-swift | Assignee: | Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Mike Abrams <mabrams> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | derekh, jjoyce, mabrams, mlopes, srevivo, zaitcev |
Target Milestone: | ga | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 9.0 (Mitaka) | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | openstack-swift-2.7.0-2.el7ost | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
This enhancement adds improved replica placement, and protection from duplicated assignments.
This was added because, in the traditional Swift layout, the act of accidentally assigning two replicas of a partition to the same device resulted in a silent reduction of durability.
As a result, duplicate assignments are prevented, thereby adhering to calculated guarantees. However, since this requires the number of devices to be no less than the number of replicas, it is possible for certain incorrect old rings to be considered invalid. Consequently, it is still possible to have the number of zones be smaller than the number of replicas.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-08-11 12:14:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sean Cohen
2016-03-10 14:48:39 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-1597.html |