Bug 1316644

Summary: Clusters page information
Product: Red Hat Storage Console Reporter: Lubos Trilety <ltrilety>
Component: UIAssignee: sankarshan <sankarshan>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Martin Kudlej <mkudlej>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2CC: mkudlej, nthomas, sankarshan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rhscon-ceph-0.0.23-1.el7scon.x86_64, rhscon-core-0.0.24-1.el7scon.x86_64, rhscon-ui-0.0.39-1.el7scon.noarch Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-19 05:31:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Lubos Trilety 2016-03-10 16:33:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
On 'Clusters' page some information is missing and some does not follow the design.

1. In design there's how much of space in cluster is used the same information as on related cluster dashboard (X of X used). However as of now UI shows free space instead (X free of X total) on 'Clusters' page. That could confuse a user because on one page he/she sees free space and on other pages he/she sees used space.

2. These numbers for free (better to be used) space and total space are not correct. It seems they are hard coded on the page and so they never change. Whilst on clusters/main dashboard they are already dynamically generated.

3. The donut chart for IOPS does not make much sense. What's maximum for IOPS? Via design there should be different chart a sparkline chart.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhscon-ui-0.0.21-1.el7.noarch
rhscon-ceph-0.0.6-11.el7.x86_64
rhscon-core-0.0.8-11.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open Clusters page

Actual results:
Information about cluster space is not correct. Moreover it does not follow the design.

Expected results:
Correct information which follow design more is shown.

Additional info:
Comment 2 Martin Kudlej 2016-07-22 10:05:46 UTC 
Tested with 
ceph-ansible-1.0.5-27.el7scon.noarch
ceph-installer-1.0.14-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-ceph-0.0.33-1.el7scon.x86_64
rhscon-core-0.0.34-1.el7scon.x86_64
rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.34-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-ui-0.0.48-1.el7scon.noarch
and 
1) OK
2) most of cases are correct, there are BZs for rest
3) solved with another graph type

--> this BZ Verified and for rest there are BZs