Bug 1317067

Summary: [anaconda] some additional i686 packages are installed on x86_64 system
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Joachim Frieben <jfrieben>
Component: compsAssignee: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: anaconda-maint-list, g.kaviyarasu, jfrieben, jonathan, kevin, pbrobinson, robatino, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vpavlin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-25 06:54:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
anaconda.log
none
dnf.log
none
dnf.rpm.log
none
ifcfg.log
none
journal.log
none
lvm.log
none
packaging.log
none
program.log
none
storage.log
none
syslog
none
X.log none

Description Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 20:51:28 UTC 
Description of problem:
After a fresh network install using the Fedora-Workstation-boot-x86_64-24-20160311.n.0 image, a number of additional i686 packages have been installed:

- nss-softokn-freebl-3.23.0-0.1.fc24.i686
- xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.18-1.fc24.i686
- glibc-2.23.1-5.fc24.i686

but -no- i686 kernel packages as reported in bug 1313957 which (was) a different issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-24.13-1.fc24

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Perform network install of current Fedora Workstation 24 x86_64.

Actual results:
For some packages both x86_64 and i686 flavours are being installed.

Expected results:
Only x86_64 packages are being installed.

Additional info:
Also the Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-20160311.n.0 live image ships the i686 packages listed above.
Comment 1 David Shea 2016-03-11 20:53:20 UTC 
Please attach the logs from the installation to this bug as individual, text/plain attachments. They are available in /tmp in the installation environment and copied to /var/log/anaconda on the installed system.
Comment 2 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:40:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1135419 [details]
anaconda.log
Comment 3 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:40:39 UTC 
Created attachment 1135420 [details]
dnf.log
Comment 4 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:41:04 UTC 
Created attachment 1135421 [details]
dnf.rpm.log
Comment 5 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:41:24 UTC 
Created attachment 1135422 [details]
ifcfg.log
Comment 6 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:42:06 UTC 
Created attachment 1135423 [details]
journal.log
Comment 7 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:42:27 UTC 
Created attachment 1135424 [details]
lvm.log
Comment 8 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:42:48 UTC 
Created attachment 1135425 [details]
packaging.log
Comment 9 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:43:06 UTC 
Created attachment 1135426 [details]
program.log
Comment 10 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:43:27 UTC 
Created attachment 1135427 [details]
storage.log
Comment 11 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:43:51 UTC 
Created attachment 1135428 [details]
syslog
Comment 12 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-11 22:44:12 UTC 
Created attachment 1135429 [details]
X.log
Comment 13 David Shea 2016-03-11 23:41:41 UTC 
xorg-x11-drv-geode is listed as a mandatory package in @base-x in comps, but the only version in the repo at https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/24/Workstation/x86_64/os/ is i686.
Comment 14 Joachim Frieben 2016-03-12 01:41:33 UTC 
(In reply to David Shea from comment #13)
For obvious reasons it does not make sense to ship an x86_64 version of xorg-x11-drv-geode; therefore, it should not be present in the x86_64 tree of Fedora 24 at all like it is also absent from the x86_64 tree of Fedora 23.
Comment 15 Kevin Fenzi 2016-03-14 20:35:27 UTC 
Filed upstream: 

https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/17
Comment 16 David Shea 2016-03-17 12:05:20 UTC 
*** Bug 1318483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***