Bug 1317183
| Summary: | Review Request: erlang-stun - STUN and TURN library for Erlang / Elixir | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Randy Barlow <rbarlow> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | lemenkov, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lemenkov:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | erlang-stun-1.0.1-1.fc25 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-04-12 16:07:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1316767 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1304923, 1312517 | ||
|
Description
Randy Barlow
2016-03-12 21:20:23 UTC
This is blocked on the erlang-fast_tls package review, since that package is a dependency of this one. I'll review it. REVIEW:
[+] rpmlint is silent (or produces only messages which can be safely ignored:
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../SRPMS/erlang-stun-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/erlang-stun-1.0.1-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
erlang-stun.x86_64: E: no-binary
erlang-stun.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
These two messages are expected for arch0independent Erlang packages.
[+] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
[+] The package meets the Erlang Packaging Guidelines.
[+] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Apache 2.0).
[+] The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc and marked as %license.
[+] The spec file is written in American English.
[+] The spec file for the package is legible.
[+] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum 1.0.1.tar.gz*
a48837cc0db5de108243466a5531c046ab86706b7779f9ebc0f381b06ebade58 1.0.1.tar.gz
a48837cc0db5de108243466a5531c046ab86706b7779f9ebc0f381b06ebade58 1.0.1.tar.gz.1
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
[+] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[+] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
[+] The spec file handles locales properly (using the %find_lang macro).
[0] No need to handle locales.
[0] The package does not contain any shared library files.
[+] Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries.
[+] The package isn't designed to be relocatable.
[+] The package owns all directories that it creates.
[+] The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
[+] Permissions on files are set properly.
[+] The package consistently uses macros.
[+] The package contains code, or permissible content.
[0] No large documentation files.
[+] Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
[0] No static libraries.
[0] No -devel sub-package.
[+] The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
[0] Not a GUI application.
[+] The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[+] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
APPROVED!
|