Bug 1317345
Summary: | Review Request: erlang-luerl - Lua in Erlang | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Randy Barlow <rbarlow> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | lemenkov, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lemenkov:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | erlang-luerl-0-20151209.9524d030.2.fc25 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-04-10 19:17:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1312517 |
Description
Randy Barlow
2016-03-14 03:45:37 UTC
REVIEW: [+] rpmlint is silent (or produces only messages which can be safely ignored. [+] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [+] The package meets the Erlang Packaging Guidelines. [+] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. [+] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Apache License 2.0) [+] The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc and marked as %license. [+] The spec file is written in American English. [+] The spec file for the package is legible. [+] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum 9524d0309a88b7c62ae93da0b632b185de3ba9db.tar.gz* b5af83ceb7b6e984487ab9170cd1c0764c3a320e8461321413d81f6d5fc42647 9524d0309a88b7c62ae93da0b632b185de3ba9db.tar.gz b5af83ceb7b6e984487ab9170cd1c0764c3a320e8461321413d81f6d5fc42647 9524d0309a88b7c62ae93da0b632b185de3ba9db.tar.gz.1 Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: [+] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [+] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [0] No need to handle locales. [0] The package does not contain any shared library files. [+] Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries. [+] The package isn't designed to be relocatable. [+] The package owns all directories that it creates. [+] The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] Permissions on files are set properly. [+] The package consistently uses macros. [+] The package contains code, or permissible content. [0] No large documentation files. [+] Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. [0] No static libraries. [0] No -devel sub-package. [+] The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. [0] Not a GUI application. [+] The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. PS a minor proposal. I dont see anything in Ejaberd which actually uses luerl internal headers (*.hrl files). Normally ones which shipped within ./src directory shoudln't be packaged - only those which stored in ./include should be. So if you just unsure what to do with these *.hrl files, then I advice you not to package them. Feel free to ignore this advice since shipping them doesn't hurt anyone. Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang-luerl Peter, I removed the internal headers as you suggested. Thanks for the review! |