| Summary: | When no SPM can be chosen, AuditLog should display notification. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Natalie Gavrielov <ngavrilo> | ||||
| Component: | BLL.Storage | Assignee: | Tal Nisan <tnisan> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Raz Tamir <ratamir> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 3.6.3.3 | CC: | bugs, ngavrilo, tnisan, ylavi | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | amureini:
ovirt-4.1?
ngavrilo: planning_ack? ngavrilo: devel_ack? ngavrilo: testing_ack? |
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-02-12 10:16:11 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Natalie Gavrielov
2016-03-14 15:16:31 UTC
Created attachment 1136191 [details]
engine.log
There is a column on SPM next to each host. You can know that no host is SPM from there. You will also get error every time a host is contending and fails. I think this is enough and that notification that none can be elected will flood the event log. Can we close this? (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #2) > There is a column on SPM next to each host. You can know that no host is SPM > from there. You will also get error every time a host is contending and > fails. Yea, you can see all hosts have "Normal" status in the SPM column and one of them is contending for SPM role (has "Contending" status), but there is no way of telling from the UI that none of these hosts can potentially be an SPM (the priority is not shown). and I don't think a user can guess that.. Maybe if it was displayed with the priority it would be clear that this host can't act as SPM. > I think this is enough and that notification that none can be elected will > flood the event log. Just saw that the RFE for flooding mechanism is still in status "New", so I won't mention anything about it. >Can we close this? Emmm... it's your call. I don't think it's an important enough scenario - and I do hope in most cases it's a transient state. Closing for the time being. |