Bug 1317764

Summary:	Rebase nfs-ganesha to upstream 2.3 stable version
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Component:	nfs-ganesha	Assignee:	Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Shashank Raj <sraj>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rhgs-3.1	CC:	akhakhar, divya, jthottan, kkeithle, mchangir, ndevos, nlevinki, rcyriac, rhinduja, sashinde, skoduri, sraj
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Rebase, ZStream
Target Release:	RHGS 3.1.3
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	nfs-ganesha-2.3.1-1	Doc Type:	Rebase: Bug Fixes Only
Doc Text:	The nfs-ganesha package has been upgraded to upstream version 2.3.1, which provides a number of bug fixes and enhancements over the previous version.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1318506 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-06-23 05:34:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1311386, 1318506, 1319476

Description Soumya Koduri 2016-03-15 07:08:07 UTC

Description of problem:

This bug is to track changes required to rebase nfs-ganesha packages to upstream 2.3 stable release.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2016-03-17 04:44:07 UTC

Note that rebasing to nfs-ganesha-2.3.x should use the now unbundled libntirpc.

libntirpc has yet to be added as a separate package in RHGS channels.

Comment 5 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2016-03-17 05:32:31 UTC

Do we need a separate BZ for adding libntirpc or can we rebase nfs-ganesha and add libntirpc under this BZ?

Comment 9 Shashank Raj 2016-04-25 07:05:05 UTC

The rebased build is made available. Current ganesha build is 2.3.1-4.

Verified the installation and performed the basic cases on both RHEL 6 and RHEL 7 platform. Installation and few regressions are successful.

All the issues reported are being tracked separately by other bz. Hence, moving this bug to verified state

Comment 10 Divya 2016-06-10 07:06:05 UTC

Soumya,

I have edited the doc text based on the errata lore: http://jenkinscat.gsslab.pnq.redhat.com:8080/job/Errata_Lore%20%28html-single%29/lastStableBuild/artifact/tmp/en-US/html-single/index.html#rebase

Please review and sign-off.

Comment 11 Soumya Koduri 2016-06-10 07:09:22 UTC

The doc text looks good to me. Shouldn't we highlight few key fixes or improvements done?

Comment 12 Divya 2016-06-13 09:57:14 UTC

Soumya,

I have updated the doc text, based on the standard rebase text format. If these are significant improvements, recommend it to be added in Release Notes than only in the erratum. But, if you think it is better we add both in the errata and RN, happy to update this doc text.

Comment 13 Soumya Koduri 2016-06-13 12:09:53 UTC

Divya,

Thanks for the clarification. That makes sense. We already have BZs to document major improvements which shall be added to RN I guess. I am fine with the current doc text for this BZ.

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2016-06-23 05:34:35 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016:1247