Bug 131822
| Summary: | Most shared libraries are being reported as not an ELF file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ernesto <ernesto> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3 | CC: | ernesto, pfrields, sct, wtogami |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-11-20 20:32:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ernesto
2004-09-05 12:23:25 UTC
Did you run a 538 kernel at some point? Unfortunately, there was an ext3 bug in that kernel which could have corrupted some data; there's no automated way to undo that short of reinstalling the broken files. You'll need to force a fsck to clean up the fs first. I was indeed running the 538 kernel at some point. What I did as a work-around: -- copy the affected files from an earlier FC3T1 systems. I did not run an fsck. I will do this as well. At this point, I am stable again. To be safe, when FC3T2 is released, I will do a fresh install. Since I don't know what other corrupt files could be lurking about. My mistake!! I actually never ran the 538 kernel. I went from 533 to 541 only. So, maybe there is some problem in the 541 kernel? These sorts of problems are much more likely to be caused by the kernel you were updating _from_ than the one you're updating _to_, since it's the older kernel which is running when the disk-intensive rpm updates are going on. So the report here is more likely to be implicating 533 than 541. Have you fsck'ed yet? If not, could you capture the output of that so we can see what's actually wrong with the fs? Thanks. Yes, I have already run fsck. |