| Summary: | Connections fail when process open file handles > 1024 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Aaron Meriwether <ameriwether> | ||||||
| Component: | libc-client | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons | ||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 6.9 | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-10-04 10:31:14 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Aaron Meriwether
2016-03-17 21:25:00 UTC
Thanks for the report. We're not planning any updates to libc-client at the moment, so if this is an issue for you in production please contact Red Hat support. Created attachment 1137743 [details]
Patch to specfile
We've patched and rebuilt the current RPM from our end already - it would just be nice to see the patch included in future builds.
For anyone else who comes across this bug report and needs the fix before the next official build from RedHat, I've attached the necessary specfile diff.
Thanks for the patch, Aaron! I've pushed this to Fedora. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/uw-imap.git/diff/?id=6ed065237ac0e86f49eff758abcc34aa948eedc0 Again, we have no current plans to update libc-client in RHEL. Please raise a ticket through the regular Red Hat support channels to ensure it receives the proper attention and prioritization to assure a timely resolution. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. |