| Summary: | Duplicate id in manage quota form | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Aziza Karol <akarol> |
| Component: | UI - OPS | Assignee: | lgalis |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Aziza Karol <akarol> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 5.5.0 | CC: | akarol, cpelland, dajohnso, dclarizi, hkataria, jhardy, lgalis, mpovolny, obarenbo |
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||
| Target Release: | 5.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | quota | ||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.6.0.1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-29 15:43:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Aziza Karol
2016-03-18 12:12:29 UTC
Dan,Its more of an issue writing QE tests. Thanks, Aziza Github link:https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/issues/7384 New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/054f41b6484d29fe55720e88b1f835f5beedab0d commit 054f41b6484d29fe55720e88b1f835f5beedab0d Author: Laura Galis <lgalis> AuthorDate: Tue Mar 29 09:35:50 2016 -0400 Commit: Laura Galis <lgalis> CommitDate: Tue Mar 29 09:36:20 2016 -0400 Use form control ids based on quota names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319005 app/views/ops/_tenant_quota_form.html.haml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Use form control ids is based on quota names. Verified:5.6.0.4-beta2.3.20160421172650_719e256 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1348 |