Bug 1319562
| Summary: | Cannot disable Satellite's default redhat_register snippet (cleanly) if custom registration is being used in %post | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | jalviso <jalviso> |
| Component: | Provisioning | Assignee: | Jan Dobes <jdobes> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 570 | CC: | dyordano, jalviso, tlestach |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-29 15:52:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
jalviso
2016-03-21 04:03:15 UTC
I've already asked the reporter on satellite-tech-list, what does the customer miss in the registration snippet http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/satellite-tech-list/2016-March/msg00158.html I'm trying to understand, why would someone need to rewrite redhat_register snippet. It's clear, why it does not make sense to use two registration snippets during one kickstart. However, the default registration snippet supports registrations with a custom activation key, that registers the kickstarted system to the channels as set in the activation key. Any subsequent actions can be defined either via post-script actions or custom snippets. I'm closing this BZ as NOTABUG. |