Bug 1319688

Summary: Probing a new RHGS node, which is part of another cluster, should throw proper error message in logs and CLI
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Gaurav Kumar Garg <ggarg>
Component: glusterdAssignee: Satish Mohan <smohan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Byreddy <bsrirama>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.1CC: amukherj, bmohanra, bsrirama, byarlaga, mlawrenc, nlevinki, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, sasundar, smohan, storage-qa-internal, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.1.3   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: glusterd
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.7.9-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When users attempted to add a node that was already part of another trusted storage pool to a new trusted storage pool with the 'gluster peer probe' command, the command failed, but did not give a clear reason for the failure. An error message has been added so that it is clear when the node is already part of another cluster.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1237022 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-23 05:04:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1311817    

Comment 3 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2016-03-21 10:46:26 UTC
downstream patch for this bug: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/70328

Comment 4 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2016-03-21 10:48:28 UTC
this bug is to track the fix
which was already in 3.1.2 but missed out as part of rebasing to 3.1.3
from upstream 3.7.9

Comment 6 Byreddy 2016-04-04 07:31:41 UTC
Verified this bug using the build "glusterfs-3.7.9-1"

Fix is working properly, The error message when tried to probe a node which is part of other cluster is proper with valid meaning.


Moving to verified state.

Comment 10 Atin Mukherjee 2016-06-14 03:33:01 UTC
LGTM :)

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-06-23 05:04:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1240