| Summary: | no explanation when no machine satisfies criteria | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Beaker | Reporter: | Marek Haicman <mhaicman> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | beaker-dev-list |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | develop | CC: | cbouchar, mjia |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-11-19 21:14:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Marek Haicman
2016-03-21 12:58:55 UTC
This has been requested many times in the past. The problem is that (in the current scheduler design) Beaker matches recipes with systems using a single, massive generated SQL query. When that matches no rows you get this message. But there is no good way for Beaker to determine, for any given candidate system, why it was excluded from the match and give a good human-readable description of the reasoning. Hello Dan, to make (my) issue clear - I understand there is no easy way to say which particular rule has biggest impact, but it would be great to have at least some simple log file stating that the recipeset is in aborted state, because it failed to find suitable machine. In current state, user has to guess whether abort happened due to too strict requested system constrains or some beaker failure. Beaker does tell you this much already -- if you open the results for the aborted recipes you will see: Recipe ID 2584892 does not match any systems Oh, I see it now! Would it be possible to place this message to the "System"? I understand that it's quite cosmetic change.. but would streamline experience with beaker UI :) [Feel free to close as notabug, in case it's not feasible, or you think it's too much effort for too little gain] |