Bug 1320428
Summary: | ospd - sat6 registration fails due to wrong detected satellite version | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Martin Schuppert <mschuppe> | |
Component: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates | Assignee: | James Slagle <jslagle> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Alexander Chuzhoy <sasha> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | jcoufal, jslagle, mburns, rhel-osp-director-maint, yjog | |
Target Milestone: | ga | Keywords: | TestOnly | |
Target Release: | 8.0 (Liberty) | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-1.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1320609 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-04-20 13:04:21 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1320609 |
Description
Martin Schuppert
2016-03-23 08:17:47 UTC
looks like there are a couple of regressions related to sat 6 registration when I added support for satellite 5. they should be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296071/ Verified: Environment: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-7.el7ost.noarch Successfully deployed overcloud and registered to sat6. if curl -L -k -s -D - -o /dev/null $ping_api | grep "200 OK"; then echo Satellite 6 detected at http://<FQDN of sat6>/; fi HTTP/1.1 200 OK Status: 200 OK Satellite 6 detected at http://<FQDN of sat6>/ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0653.html |