| Summary: | test_preserve_preexisting_port fails | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Arie Bregman <abregman> |
| Component: | openstack-nova | Assignee: | Eoghan Glynn <eglynn> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | nlevinki <nlevinki> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.0 (Juno) | CC: | berrange, dasmith, eglynn, kchamart, ndipanov, sbauza, sferdjao, sgordon, vromanso, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 8.0 (Liberty) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-24 16:51:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
The preserve_ports flag has been reverted from Tempest now that Juno is EOL upstream [1]. The correct solution is to use an "older" Tempest for testing RHOS 6 and RHOS 5. There's a proposed patch [2] to Khaleesi that would implement that. Once this patch merges, this bug should go away. [1] https://github.com/openstack/tempest/commit/fe3343768144080c42c88f9bd23edd065f84c427 [2] https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/270326/ |
Description of problem: Running tempest tests on OSP 6 (&5) fails for 'tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_preserve_preexisting_port' Although tempest.conf includes -> preserve_ports = false Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6,5 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Deploy OSP 6 with Packstack (all-in-one or multi-node) 2. Run tempest test: tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_preserve_preexisting_port Actual results: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/test.py", line 113, in wrapper return f(self, *func_args, **func_kwargs) File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/scenario/test_network_basic_ops.py", line 661, in test_preserve_preexisting_port port = self.ports_client.show_port(port_id)['port'] File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/services/network/ports_client.py", line 30, in show_port return self.show_resource(uri, **fields) File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/services/network/base.py", line 52, in show_resource resp, body = self.get(req_uri) File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 274, in get return self.request('GET', url, extra_headers, headers) File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 642, in request resp, resp_body) File "/home/cloud-user/tempest-dir/tempest/lib/common/rest_client.py", line 695, in _error_checker raise exceptions.NotFound(resp_body, resp=resp) NotFound: Object not found Details: {u'message': u'Port 45aa47b4-4ff3-4436-b0fc-a58ba8fb8679 could not be found', u'type': u'PortNotFound', u'detail': u''} Expected results: Test passed (or skipped?) Additional info: Maybe this should be backported?: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126309