| Summary: | Destination blocked warning although PAGE address full policy being used | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Tyronne Wickramarathne <tywickra> |
| Component: | HornetQ | Assignee: | Yong Hao Gao <hgao> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Miroslav Novak <mnovak> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.4.6 | CC: | csuconic, msvehla |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-24 02:47:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Tyronne Wickramarathne
2016-03-23 23:40:30 UTC
Hey, GC is a common issue and affects the whole application, not just the specific sending in this case. So I don't think it's proper to add this warning to this log. Users who are getting frequent long time GC have options to deal with it: 1) enlarge callTimeout to a suitable value so it won't get timed out in case GC happens. 2) using non-blocking send. I'll reject this based on above reason. Thanks Howard |