Bug 1320851

Summary: RFE: HTTP/2 for the default router
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Christophe Augello <caugello>
Component: RFEAssignee: Ben Bennett <bbennett>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Johnny Liu <jialiu>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.1.0CC: acomabon, aos-bugs, bbennett, byount, cmilsted, cscribne, ddelcian, erich, gferrazs, hongli, jkaur, jokerman, knakayam, mangirdas, mcurry, mmccomas, rbost, rspazzol, sjr
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3.11.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-10-04 15:54:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Christophe Augello 2016-03-24 07:58:19 UTC 
> 3. What is the nature and description of the request?

State of the art request handling.
HTTP/2 is more and more coming for modern web application.
OpenShift should be able to handle this native.

https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/http2-configuring-haproxy.html

> 4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

Push message to the browser web application.

> 5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

A example solution look like this
https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/http2-configuring-haproxy.html

> 6. For each functional requirement listed in question 5, specify how Red Hat
> and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

You can use this tool to check if the setup work.
https://tools.keycdn.com/http2-test

> 7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
N/A

> 8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies?

Openshift v 3.x

> 9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
  No

> 10. List any affected packages or components.
openshift3/ose-haproxy-router

> 11. Would the customer be able to assis
Yes.
Comment 3 Mangirdas 2016-08-22 14:26:00 UTC 
If you need more details, just ask here. We will try provide as much as we can here
Comment 6 Dan McPherson 2017-02-21 16:27:47 UTC 
*** Bug 1425431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Ben Bennett 2018-10-04 15:54:19 UTC 
This is in 3.11.

So the router can accept http/2 connections, but can not use http/2 to the backend because haproxy does not yet have that capability.

https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/19968