Bug 1320876

Summary: Review Request: catch - C++ Automated Test Cases in Headers
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, projects.rg, tom
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-29 14:59:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1320878    

Description Igor Gnatenko 2016-03-24 09:08:35 UTC 
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/catch.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/catch-1.4.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description:
Catch is a multi-paradigm automated test framework for C++ and Objective-C.

Its key features are:

* Distributed as a single header file with no dependencies.
* Test cases are self-registering.
* Test cases can be de divided into isolated sections.
* Behaviour Driven Design style is possible with GIVEN-WHEN-THEN
  in place of test cases and sections.
* Only one core assertion macro for comparisons; standard language
  operators are used for comparison, yet the expression is decomposed
  and properly logged.

Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain
Comment 1 Raphael Groner 2016-03-28 17:26:35 UTC 
Hi Igor,
are you interested in a review swap with bug #1321473?
Comment 2 Raphael Groner 2016-03-29 14:41:17 UTC 
Why do you request a new review? There's already a catch package.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/catch/
Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2016-03-29 14:44:06 UTC 
Review for available package is in bug #1264485.
Comment 4 Tom Hughes 2016-03-29 14:59:24 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1264485 ***