| Summary: | Please remove (orphan) geary from next Fedora version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Stadelmann <fedora> |
| Component: | geary | Assignee: | Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | justin.brown, michel, projects.rg, thomas.moschny |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-25 18:40:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Christian Stadelmann
2016-03-25 15:58:06 UTC
I fail to see any death here. Last commit at upstream is 24 hours old. https://git.gnome.org/browse/geary/log/ There is a difference between discussing whether Geary should be the default email client and totally retiring it from the distribution. As there recently have been discussions about finding new maintainers (see for example this thread https://mail.gnome.org/archives/geary-list/2016-March/msg00002.html) and even someone volunteering, I see no reason for hastily retiring Geary from Fedora. |