Bug 1321649

Summary:	RFE: make async messenger experimental downstream
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Samuel Just <sjust>
Component:	RADOS	Assignee:	Boris Ranto <branto>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	shylesh <shmohan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	2.0	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, hnallurv, kchai, kdreyer, sjust
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	2.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-10.2.1-1.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.1-2redhat1xenial	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-08-23 19:35:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Samuel Just 2016-03-28 18:39:04 UTC

Description of problem:

Aynsc messenger is now non-experimental upstream.  It needs to be experimental downstream.  Basically just git revert 614597b9e9dcab329033c50852c25e92df8354b6

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Samuel Just 2016-04-08 14:38:36 UTC

All we need to do is b83f339f1dbcba4e48c7f4a36235ab9e7c3c9837 downstream.

Comment 3 Christina Meno 2016-04-09 13:45:05 UTC

Sam,

Just to confirm Async-Messenger is meant to be non-experimental upstream correct? Said differently -- you don't want to revert it upstream and have us rebase onto that. IS that right?

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-21 22:19:30 UTC

Comment 2 should read "all we have to do is *revert* (that commit)". Right?

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 19:35:09 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1755.html