| Summary: | removing two packages references 340 other packages | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | George R. Goffe <grgoffe> | ||||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||
| Version: | 23 | CC: | grgoffe, jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, vmukhame | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-21 14:27:15 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
George R. Goffe
2016-03-30 07:13:27 UTC
Do you get the same result with clean_requirements_on_remove=false? Michal, Where does this go? A config file? Command line? I was attempting to point out a possible problem with F23 or DNF. George... It's inside /etc/dnf/dnf.conf. You can also disable it temporarily from commandline by supplying additional option --setopt=clean_requirements_on_remove=false . Michal, Sorry to take so long to clear this need info flag... I missed it somehow... Must be getting old or something. I haven't tried it yet. I'm a little nervous about this option. Is there a document I can read up on before I try this option? Thanks, George... Michal, Thanks for the link. I changed the config file and am now running the "dnf erase ktorrent-nepomuk'*'" command. It looks like dnf is still erasing packages... GULP... 232 of them. I'll add the report file in a separate bugzilla entry. I'll be re-installing these removed packages. Sigh. George... /etc/dnf# cat dnf.conf [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=5 clean_requirements_on_remove=False Created attachment 1148253 [details]
gzip'd flat file containing the output of DNF for this operation.
Please provide us debugdata produced by supplying the --debugsolver option to DNF. Created attachment 1150536 [details]
gzip'd tar file containing debugdata and log of "erase" operation
I had to let the erase of the other packages happen to get the data. I'll hold off on re-installing them. Ok?
Thanks for the data. I will investigate but from first look it seems `nepomuk` is the critical component required by others. Jan, You're welcome. I think I saw that Nepomuk is obsoleting soon. Regards, George... "rpm -qa | grep nepomuk" shows kdelibs-nepomuk'*' present. dnf erase of those two libs tried to remove 256 others. This may not be a bug... I reported it because it looked odd. Sorry to waste your time. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Those are hard dependencies. DNF can't do anything about that. |