Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||JS math is grotesquely wrong on AMD64|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Nicholas Miell <nmiell>|
|Component:||firefox||Assignee:||Christopher Aillon <caillon>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2004-09-26 21:12:37 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Nicholas Miell 2004-09-09 20:15:30 EDT
Comment 1 Nicholas Miell 2004-09-09 20:17:11 EDT
Created attachment 103660 [details] Enlighten fdlibm regarding AMD64's endianness. This also does s/VA_COPY/va_copy/, which doesn't seem to break firefox in practice, but does break the stand-alone JS interpreter.
Comment 2 Christopher Aillon 2004-09-10 09:27:29 EDT
Our Firefox package will pull this in when upstream pushes its next release, which according to the roadmap will be soon.
Comment 3 Nicholas Miell 2004-09-21 19:20:53 EDT
The 1.0 PR1 release does not include this bug fix, and, afaik, this fix has not yet been merged upstream. The Fedora roadmap lists the FC3 final release date as Nov 1, the Mozilla roadmap lists the Firefox 1.0 release date as Oct 11. If the Firefox final release date slips past the FC3 release date, or this fix is not merged upstream in time for Firefox 1.0, then this patch will need to be applied to whatever ships in FC3.
Comment 4 Dan Williams 2004-09-24 11:37:26 EDT
This seems like a no-brainer to apply though Chris... can't we include it until it actually _does_ come down from upstream?
Comment 5 Christopher Aillon 2004-09-24 11:50:05 EDT
The patch attached does not compile across the board. I pinged upstream yesterday and there is something checked in now that I'll have a look at and port over to our builds.
Comment 6 Christopher Aillon 2004-09-26 21:12:37 EDT
Fixed in firefox-0.10.0-1.0PR1.1 which should be available tomorrow morning.
Comment 7 Christopher Blizzard 2004-09-29 13:08:32 EDT
Was this fixed in the mozilla package as well?
Comment 8 Christopher Blizzard 2004-09-29 13:16:31 EDT
Ahh, looks like it's in the 1.7.x tree.