Bug 1322699

Summary: [Docs][Admin][RFE] Note that tagged and untagged VLAN networks can be used together on interfaces and bonds
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Lucy Bopf <lbopf>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Byron Gravenorst <bgraveno>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Tahlia Richardson <trichard>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.6.0CC: alkaplan, byount, danken, gklein, lsurette, mkalinin, rbalakri, srevivo, ylavi
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.6.7Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-03 23:37:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Docs RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Lucy Bopf 2016-03-31 07:18:22 UTC
From RHEV 3.6, tagged and untagged VLAN networks can be used together on interfaces and bonds. There are a few sections in the Admin Guide that state that this is not possible. These sections should be updated.


Note: More detailed information on configuring interfaces and bonds has been requested, and will be covered in bug 980360.

Comment 1 Lucy Bopf 2016-05-03 06:22:58 UTC
Assigning to Byron for review.

Comment 4 Marina Kalinin 2016-05-17 21:12:06 UTC
I think we need to ask someone who understands linux networking better. 
Based on bug title, that line is incorrect. But I am not really sure what is actually correct.

Dan, maybe you can clarify?

Comment 5 Yaniv Lavi 2016-06-21 11:31:13 UTC
Can you reply on the question above?

Comment 6 Alona Kaplan 2016-06-21 12:12:53 UTC
(In reply to Marina from comment #4)
> I think we need to ask someone who understands linux networking better. 
> Based on bug title, that line is incorrect. But I am not really sure what is
> actually correct.
> 
> Dan, maybe you can clarify?

The line is still correct since when creating a bond we still need to check whether the logical networks are compatible. For example, two non-vlan networks still cannot be assigned to the same bond/interface.

This RFE is talking about removing the restriction of having non-vlan vm network attached to the same nic with vlan networks.

Now, after the fix, one non-vlan (vm or non-vm) network can reside on the same nic with multiple vlan networks (previously is was allowed only for non-vlan non-vm network).

More details can be found in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1227865