| Summary: | RFE Dynamically provisioned pv should handle the permissions out of the box. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Christophe Augello <caugello> |
| Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Erin Boyd <eboyd> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Jianwei Hou <jhou> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, bchilds, caugello, eboyd, eparis, jokerman, mmccomas, pep |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-01-03 21:57:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1267746 | ||
|
Description
Christophe Augello
2016-03-31 08:04:33 UTC
It looks like you're using the experimental (tech preview) Dynamic Provisioning feature. Does this issue still occur if you just claim against an existing Persistent Volume that was manually created? If so, can you provide a reproducer? I believe that this request boils down to this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318764#c3 i.e. the fsGroup setting in the restricted SCC, which has changed by default in 3.2 and can be manually changed in 3.1: "fsGroup.type=MustRunAs". Can you confirm that this is the case? If so, maybe what we need here is to document this a bit better OK, assigning to Erin Boyd's team to take a look. If the previous bug was closed as 'not a bug' that this BZ refers to, can someone please summarize the status of this? Can someone provide concise reconstruction instructions, please Closing this bug due to age. |