| Summary: | kibana-ops not working as expected | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaspreet Kaur <jkaur> |
| Component: | Logging | Assignee: | Luke Meyer <lmeyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | chunchen <chunchen> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, ewolinet, jcantril, jkaur, jnordell, lmeyer, misalunk, rmeggins, wsun |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-04-14 13:11:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Jaspreet Kaur
2016-04-04 12:38:47 UTC
The output looks like there was some problem deploying with the OPS cluster: oc get pods NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE logging-deployer-31jks 0/1 Completed 0 47m logging-es-b4iatq7j-1-pjx8q 1/1 Running 0 41m logging-fluentd-1-m020i 1/1 Running 0 41m logging-fluentd-1-p94g2 1/1 Running 0 41m logging-kibana-1-rfgzm 2/2 Running 0 40m If you were using the OPS cluster you would have logging-es-ops-xxx and logging-kibana-ops-xxx pods running. Let's take a look at the logs from the deployer: # oc logs logging-deployer-31jks The deployer pod is probably gone by now. But yes, attach a log from the deployer if you can reproduce this. You should definitely be seeing -ops pods in the list. Otherwise I'd expect the ops service/route to give you a nice big 503 error, not a blank screen. In addition to deployer logs, logs from fluentd would be helpful. Do you see anything when visiting the non-ops kibana? One other question; is this a containerized install or an RPM-based install? |