Bug 1324004
Summary: | arbiter volume write performance is bad. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
Component: | arbiter | Assignee: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | mainline | CC: | bugs | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.8rc2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1324809 1375125 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-06-16 14:03:04 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1324809 |
Description
Ravishankar N
2016-04-05 10:33:12 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13906 (arbiter: write performance improvement) posted (#1) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) Note: With the patch applied, here is the throughput I get: Arbiter: 0:root@vm2 ~$ gluster v create testvol replica 3 arbiter 1 127.0.0.2:/bricks/brick{1..3} forcevolume create: testvol: success: please start the volume to access data 0:root@vm2 ~$ gluster v start testvol volume start: testvol: success 0:root@vm2 ~$ mount -t glusterfs 127.0.0.2:testvol /mnt/fuse_mnt 0:root@vm2 ~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/fuse_mnt/file bs=1M count=100 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.25445 s, 83.6 MB/s REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13906 (arbiter: write performance improvement) posted (#2) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13906 (arbiter: write performance improvement) posted (#3) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13906 (arbiter: write performance improvement) posted (#4) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13906 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit e1004679563ef17c460f83098983baf105655712 Author: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Date: Tue Apr 5 15:16:52 2016 +0530 arbiter: write performance improvement Problem: The throughput for a 'dd' workload was much less for arbiter configuration when compared to normal replica-3 volume. There were 2 issues: i)arbiter_writev was using the request dict as response dict while unwinding, leading to incorect GLUSTERFS_WRITE_IS_APPEND and GLUSTERFS_OPEN_FD_COUNT values (=4), leading to immediate post-ops because is_afr_delayed_changelog_post_op_needed() failed due to afr_are_multiple_fds_opened() check. ii) The arbiter code in afr was setting local->transaction.{start and len} =0 to take full file locks. What this meant was even for simultaenous but non-overlapping writevs, afr_transaction_eager_lock_init() was not happening because afr_locals_overlap() always stays true. Consequently is_afr_delayed_changelog_post_op_needed() failed due to local->delayed_post_op not being set. Fix: i) Send appropriate response dict values in arbiter_writev. ii) Modify flock params instead of local->transaction.{start and len} to take full file locks in the transaction. Also changed _fill_writev_xdata() in posix to fill rsp_xdata for whatever key is requested for. Change-Id: I1c5fc5e98aba49ade540bb441a022e65b753432a BUG: 1324004 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Reported-by: Robert Rauch <robert.rauch> Reported-by: Russel Purinton <russell.purinton> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13906 Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user |