| Summary: | [RFE] Support function to move one specific pod | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Kenjiro Nakayama <knakayam> |
| Component: | RFE | Assignee: | Andy Goldstein <agoldste> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, knakayam, mmccomas |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-04-26 13:37:44 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Kenjiro Nakayama
2016-04-07 10:25:57 UTC
It's unclear with the rescheduler (https://trello.com/c/t5UpuU1C) that we want to tackle this. If you want to force a pod onto a particular set of nodes you should use a node selector or other predicate/priority logic to do so. If you want to evacuate a node we have the oadm tools to do so. If you don't like where a pod is getting scheduled and want to give it more or less resources you should adjust the request/limits of the pod. If we let you pick where to move it to we still have to follow all the rules of where it is allowed to go according to all the rules of the scheduler. It would be a bad experience to let you specify nodes and constantly tell you why your choice is invalid. Given all this, can you please clarify the need to move a particular pod to a particular node? RFE has been withdrawn. Closing. |