Bug 1324998

Summary: [RFE] It should not be possible to disable features on Satellite at time of installation which would break Satellite
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Amit Upadhye <aupadhye>
Component: InstallerAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1.7CC: bkearney, stbenjam
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-02 17:21:50 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Amit Upadhye 2016-04-07 19:40:26 UTC 
1. Proposed title of this feature request  
  
There are multiple options with 'katello-installer' in case customer uses wrong options then it is possible that it would break Satellite. As example one of customer disabled puppet at time of install which broke Satellite, it was not possible to publish any content view.

Bugzilla for reference 1324897
  
2. Who is the customer behind the request?  

GSS sponsored feature request.

3. What is the nature and description of the request?  

The katello-installer should not work without mandatory options or features like puppet.

4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)  

To avoid any cases where not enabling some features or using wrong options really breaks Satellite.
  
6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.  

Confirming katello-installer throws error and stops on using invalid options or when not using mandatory options.
  
7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?  

No.
  
8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?  

No.

9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?  

No.

10. List any affected packages or components.  

Unknown.

11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?  

Yes.
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2016-04-22 19:35:27 UTC 
Opening back up.. based on comments from Stephen
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2017-11-02 17:21:19 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.
Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2017-11-02 17:21:50 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.