Bug 1326014

Summary: Bonding broken in RC 1
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Chris Dearborn <christopher_dearborn>
Component: rhosp-directorAssignee: Angus Thomas <athomas>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Arik Chernetsky <achernet>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)CC: arkady_kanevsky, cdevine, dbecker, gael_rehault, John_walsh, kurt_hey, mburns, morazi, randy_perryman, rhel-osp-director-maint, rsussman, sreichar, wayne_allen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-11 15:26:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1261979, 1310828    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Network configuration files none

Description Chris Dearborn 2016-04-11 15:17:05 UTC
Created attachment 1146019 [details]
Network configuration files

Description of problem:
After installing RC 1, we attempted to deploy the overcloud, which failed.  Investigation showed that the master bond ifcfg files were set up on the overcloud nodes, but the slave ifcfg files were not set up correctly.  They were all missing the lines that specify that this interface is a slave and the bond that it's associated with.  Specifically, these lines were missing from all slave ifcfg files on all nodes:

MASTER=bondX
SLAVE=yes


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OSP 8, RC 1

How reproducible:
Install OSP 8 RC1 and attempt to deploy an overcloud.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above.

Actual results:
Overcloud fails to deploy, and the only working network is the provisioning network.

Expected results:
Overcloud should deploy correctly.

Additional info:
We're using Linux bonds, not OVS bonds.  See attached for the associated files.

Comment 2 Chris Dearborn 2016-04-11 15:25:51 UTC
Note that these configuration files worked with OSP8 Beta 9.

Comment 3 Mike Burns 2016-04-11 15:26:49 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1323717 ***