Bug 1326025

Summary: upgrade sets the wrong repo name for satellite 6 and cdn
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Mike Burns <mburns>
Component: openstack-tripleo-heat-templatesAssignee: Mike Burns <mburns>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Alexander Chuzhoy <sasha>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)CC: akaris, ipilcher, mburns, rhel-osp-director-maint
Target Milestone: async   
Target Release: 8.0 (Liberty)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-8.el7ost Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1329792 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-20 13:04:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1329792    

Description Mike Burns 2016-04-11 15:34:04 UTC 
Description of problem:
previous release of OSP used rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0* for repository names, but OSP8 uses openstack-8* instead (not 8.0).

Upgrades changes the repos being used to 8.0 instead of 8.
Comment 2 Alexander Chuzhoy 2016-04-19 20:03:38 UTC 
Verified:
Environment:
openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-0.8.14-9.el7ost.noarch

Compared the yum repos:
Before the upgrade:
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-director-rpms/7Server/x86_64 
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-rpms/7Server/x86_64          

After passing the major-upgrade-pacemaker-init step:
rhel-7-server-openstack-8-director-rpms/7Server/x86_64 
rhel-7-server-openstack-8-rpms/7Server/x86_64          



No 8.0 ^^.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2016-04-20 13:04:48 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0653.html
Comment 5 Mike Burns 2016-04-20 19:56:04 UTC 
*** Bug 1328978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Ian Pilcher 2016-04-22 23:31:44 UTC 
*** Bug 1329770 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***