Bug 1326936

Summary: [RHCeph 2.0 / 10.1.1] layout_vxattrs.sh failed because pool namespace support hasn't been back-ported to RHEL
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar>
Component: CephFSAssignee: Yan, Zheng <zyan>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: shylesh <shmohan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.0CC: ceph-eng-bugs, john.spray, kdreyer, vakulkar, zyan
Target Milestone: rcFlags: kdreyer: needinfo? (vakulkar)
Target Release: 2.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-10 20:26:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Vasu Kulkarni 2016-04-13 19:26:54 UTC
Description of problem:

This is to get the kernel fix for the below issue, I believe it is not available in any upstream tree as well

   /home/ubuntu/cephtest/workunit.client.0/fs/misc/layout_vxattrs.sh’

 layout_vxattrs.sh failed because pool namespace support hasn't been back-ported to RHEL

10.1.1


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/vasu-2016-04-06_20:30:11-kcephfs-jewel---basic-clara/217662/

Comment 2 Vasu Kulkarni 2016-04-22 17:32:47 UTC
Yan,

If you have a fix or workaround in your tree please provide the steps that we can verify in Ceph 2.0

Comment 3 Yan, Zheng 2016-04-25 01:40:27 UTC
The code is at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client/tree/testing, but it's still not upstreamed. what else should I do for this bugzilla item?

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-26 14:43:46 UTC
If zyan's kernel code is not yet upstream, I doubt the RHEL team will take it in their kernel at this time.

It sounds like you'll have to skip or modify this particular QA test when testing CephFS in the RHEL kernel.

Comment 5 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-04-26 21:05:25 UTC
Vasu can you please update the test until the code is fixed in the RHEL kernel?

Comment 6 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-05-10 13:11:41 UTC
From Vasu's email today:
> I am going to remove this test from the suite, will move this to
> manual verification with custom kernel if thats possible.

Comment 7 Vasu Kulkarni 2016-05-10 18:21:53 UTC
I have filtered this test so it will not be run.