Bug 1327980 (python-pickleshare)

Summary:	Review Request: python-pickleshare - Tiny 'shelve'-like database with concurrency support
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, puntogil, quantum.analyst
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-01-09 07:39:04 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-18 08:07:57 UTC

Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pickleshare.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pickleshare-0.7.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
PickleShare - a small 'shelve' like datastore with concurrency support.

Like shelve, a PickleShareDB object acts like a normal dictionary.
Unlike shelve, many processes can access the database simultaneously.
Changing a value in database is immediately visible to other processes
accessing the same database.

Concurrency is possible because the values are stored in separate files.
Hence the "database" is a directory where all files are governed by
PickleShare.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-18 08:14:42 UTC

For python2 it requires some another package, I will send it it review ASAP.

Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-01-09 03:48:59 UTC

I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a dependency on python2-six.

It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in bug 1379093.

Comment 3 Igor Gnatenko 2017-01-09 07:39:04 UTC

(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2)
> I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a
> dependency on python2-six.
> 
> It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in
> bug 1379093.
Check the dates. Mine is open since April, that one is from September. 

Gil, can you check for duplicates before?

Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2017-01-09 13:47:41 UTC

(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2)
> > I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a
> > dependency on python2-six.
> > 
> > It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in
> > bug 1379093.
> Check the dates. Mine is open since April, that one is from September. 
> 
> Gil, can you check for duplicates before?

Sorry for the inconvenience. But I do not have much time available,
to check for duplicates.