|Summary:||"dnf upgrade-to" requiring full NEVRA|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan>|
|Component:||dnf||Assignee:||Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, vmukhame|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2016-12-15 12:17:16 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Nick Coghlan 2016-04-18 08:29:10 UTC
Description of problem: "sudo dnf upgrade-to --allowerasing docker-2:1.9.1" fails, but "sudo dnf upgrade-to --allowerasing docker-2:1.9.1-9.gitee06d03.fc23" works Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-1.1.8-1.fc23.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Attempt to update to a specific version with just the NEV (no R or A) 2. 3. Actual results: Error: No packages marked for upgrade. Expected results: Same behaviour as when specifying the full NEVRA Additional info: "dnf info" works correctly when given only the NEV information
Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-07-08 09:39:48 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-25 07:23:14 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Comment 3 Michael Mráka 2016-11-28 14:56:37 UTC
Still valid in rawhide - dnf-2.0.0-0.rc1.4.fc26.noarch # dnf upgrade-to --allowerasing docker-2:1.12.3-22.git7b5044b.fc26 Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:41 ago on Mon Nov 28 15:19:42 2016 CET. Dependencies resolved. ========================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ========================================================================================================== Installing: docker x86_64 2:1.12.3-22.git7b5044b.fc26 rawhide 17 M Installing dependencies: ... Total download size: 24 M Installed size: 81 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. # dnf upgrade-to --allowerasing docker-2:1.12.3 Last metadata expiration check: 0:34:18 ago on Mon Nov 28 15:19:42 2016 CET. Error: No packages marked for upgrade. CC jmracek: Jarda this seem to be yet another instance of wrong subject handling.
Comment 4 Jaroslav Mracek 2016-11-29 07:22:13 UTC
Here is patch that solves the problem by making from upgrade-to alias for upgrade: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/665