Bug 1328244

Summary:	Satellite 6.2.0 Beta: remove the default foreman scenario from foreman-installer and emphasize katello scenario to prevent customer confusion/pain
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Xixi <xdmoon>
Component:	Installer	Assignee:	Martin Bacovsky <mbacovsk>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Lukas Pramuk <lpramuk>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2.0	CC:	bbuckingham, bkearney, ehelms, lpramuk, mbacovsk, mmccune, sthirugn
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	katello-installer-base-3.0.0.19-1	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-07-27 11:17:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1115190

Description Xixi 2016-04-18 20:08:53 UTC

Description of problem:
For Satellite 6.2 Beta the new installer is foreman-installer, with default scenario as foreman, which is not the correct one to use for Satellite install; there is also no messaging in the utility to use katello if installing Satellite.

Customers can easily and very likely choose the default foreman-scenario when trying to install Sat 6.2 Beta, and end up with incomplete Sat6 install/missing functionality which would look like an issue/bug - for example "not see content and subscription related menu items, (i.e. wouldn't be able to import a manifest)" - rather than having chosen the wrong scenario.

To avoid unnecessary customer confusion and pain, we need to:
a) delete foreman scenario for beta;
and
b) state clearly in foreman-installer commandline (when run without arguments and when listing/running scenarios) to use katello scenario for Satellite installation, and capsule scenario for Capsule installation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite 6.2.0 Beta

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. (see above)
2.
3.

Actual results:
(see above)

Expected results:
(see above)

Additional info:

Comment 3 Martin Bacovsky 2016-04-18 20:53:18 UTC

Proposed low risk changes for Beta:
- description of Katello scenario [1] 
- removal of foreman scenario [2]

[1] https://gitlab.sat.lab.tlv.redhat.com/satellite6/katello-installer/merge_requests/43
[2] https://gitlab.sat.lab.tlv.redhat.com/satellite6/satellite-packaging/merge_requests/22

Comment 4 Xixi 2016-04-18 21:16:19 UTC

(In reply to Martin Bacovsky from comment #3)
> Proposed low risk changes for Beta:
> - description of Katello scenario [1] 
> - removal of foreman scenario [2]
> 
> [1]
> https://gitlab.sat.lab.tlv.redhat.com/satellite6/katello-installer/
> merge_requests/43

"Install Satellite server with Capsule"

Thank you Martin - to clarify this for customers, could we change "Capsule" to "Integrated Capsule"?  or remove "with Capsule" if it's always implied with a Satellite 6 installation, whichever is more consistent with the Installation Guide docs). 

> [2]
> https://gitlab.sat.lab.tlv.redhat.com/satellite6/satellite-packaging/
> merge_requests/22

Comment 5 Martin Bacovsky 2016-04-19 11:41:43 UTC

Description was changed to "Install Satellite server with Integrated Capsule".

Comment 6 Lukas Pramuk 2016-04-21 12:19:05 UTC

VERIFIED.

@Sat6.2.0-Beta-Snap9
foreman-installer-1.11.0.3-1.el7sat.noarch

# foreman-installer --list-scenarios
Available scenarios
  Capsule (use: --scenario capsule)
        Install a stand-alone Capsule.
  Katello (INSTALLED)
        Install Satellite server with Integrated Capsule

# foreman-installer --scenario foreman
ERROR: Scenario (/etc/foreman-installer/scenarios.d/foreman.yaml) was not found, can not continue

>>> now Katello scenario has decent description and Foreman scenario doesn't exist

Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-27 11:17:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501