Bug 1328628

Summary:	rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7 channel maps are absent from channel-cert-mapping.txt
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	John Sefler <jsefler>
Component:	subscription-manager-migration-data	Assignee:	vritant <vrjain>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	7.3	CC:	skallesh, vrjain
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-03 20:28:16 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John Sefler 2016-04-19 22:33:52 UTC

Description of problem:

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-debuginfo' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools-debuginfo' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>

RHN Classic channel 'rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director-debuginfo' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false>



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@jsefler-7 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-2.0.24-1.el7.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
[root@jsefler-7 ~]# grep "rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7" /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt
[root@jsefler-7 ~]# 


Actual results:
  above (no hits)

Expected results:
  expected the grep to find channel maps to product ID 191 for:
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-debuginfo
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools-debuginfo
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director-debuginfo



Additional info:

Comment 2 Shwetha Kallesh 2016-05-02 07:54:33 UTC

Marking verified!!

[root@dhcp35-31 ~]# rpm -qa | grep migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-2.0.28-1.el7.noarch


[root@dhcp35-31 ~]# grep "rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7" /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt

rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-debuginfo: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-director-debuginfo: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-7-ost-7-optools-debuginfo: OpenStack-7.0-Operational-Tools-x86_64-5dc9c350a15b-191.pem

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 20:28:16 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2592.html